Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike's avatar

This why I’ve replaced government bonds in my portfolio with gold. I know it’s not exactly the same (no yield for example), but it typically does perform well in inflationary environments, it’s the only currency that has never failed in thousands of years, and supply is limited. Even if a small portion of government bond holders internationally moved to gold the supply and demand imbalance would have an extremely positive effect on gold price due to limited supply. All the easy gold has been found.

DiviStock Chronicles's avatar

Honestly, this really lines up with what I’ve been noticing too. Your point about Canadians unknowingly sitting on a pile of bond risk feels almost identical to what I wrote recently about the whole “Bond Trap” idea. Both pieces are basically saying the same thing: the old assumptions about bonds being the safe part of the portfolio just don’t hold up anymore.

https://divistockchronicles.substack.com/p/why-you-might-be-walking-into-a-bond

The Loonie Hour article talks a lot about how Canada’s deficits, rising debt costs, and sticky inflation are creating this nasty loop that pushes yields up and bond prices down. In my post, I looked at it more from the angle of duration risk and why long-term bonds can quietly wreck your returns if rates keep rising. Different angles, same conclusion — long-term bonds just aren’t the no‑brainer they used to be.

And the part about people being exposed through balanced funds? Yup. That’s exactly why I broke down the difference between short-term T‑bill ETFs like CBIL and broad market funds like ZAG. Most folks don’t realize how much interest rate risk they’re actually holding until it’s too late.

Feels like more and more people are waking up to the idea that “safe” isn’t always safe, especially in this environment.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?