Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KxS's avatar

Richard, Richard, Richard… you buried the lede.

The good news is that I largely agree with you…

There is a raw, burning need to put some emphasis on that agreement, however; and to that end I want to note that Canada’s equity outperformance is a function of global commodity scarcity, underinvestment in mining capacity, and macroeconomic uncertainty that favours gold.

It is NOT evidence of domestic productivity improvement, competitiveness gains, or broad‑based economic momentum, or really anything resembling a strong economy.

But will Liberal politicians avoid interpreting equity performance as validation of economic strategy? Of course, because they well know that Canadians are financially illiterate. But the drivers are exogenous.

If the commodity cycle persists, Canada will continue to benefit passively. If it reverses, equity performance will adjust sharply, independent of domestic policy choices... and

with the failure of free trade renewal, the entire logic of Canada’s equity outperformance becomes even more concentrated, even more externally driven, and even more disconnected from domestic economic fundamentals.

The TSX becomes a pure commodity‑cycle asset, not an economy‑linked one, as the economy weakens, and gold strengthens.

Brian C.'s avatar

So few jobs created ?

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?